IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 119 AMAN KUMAR @ HONEY STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : None for the petitioner. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab MANISHA BATRA There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner despite the fact that the matter has been passed over twice It appears petition any more. Hence, the same is dismissed for want of prosecution. 28.04.2025 Jyoti-IV IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M Date of decision: AMAN KUMAR @ HONEY Versus STATE OF PUNJAB HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA BATRA None for the petitioner. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner despite the fact that the matter has been passed over twice. It appears that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the present petition any more. Hence, the same is dismissed for want of prosecution. (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH M No.22258 of 2025 Date of decision: 28.04.2025 …. Petitioner …. Respondent MANISHA BATRA Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner despite the . that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the present petition any more. Hence, the same is dismissed for want of prosecution. (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner despite the that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the present Jyoti 2025.04.29 09:35 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document