Begusarai Prakhand Matsyajivi Sahyog Samiti Ltd. and Anr v. The State Of Bihar and Ors
CWJC/14187/2016 · 2025-07-28
Rajiv Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19946 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19946 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14187 of 2016 ======================================================
1. Begusarai Prakhand Matsyajivi Sahyog Samiti Ltd. and Anr son of Shri Kusho sahni resident of Village and PO- Chandpura, P.S.- Neema Chandpura, Distt- Begusarai
2. Balmiki Sahni sn of Shri Kusho Sahni resident of Village and PO- Chandpura, P.S.- Neema Chandpura, Distt- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State Of Bihar and Ors
2. The District Magistrate, Begusarai
3. The Director Fisheries, Bihar,Patna
4. The District Fisheries Officer-cum-Chief Executive Officer, Begusarai
5. Nirmala Devi wife of Sri Sunder Kumar Sahni resident of Village and PO- Chandpura, P.S.- Neema Chandpura, Distt- Begusarai
6. Bhagirath Sahni son of Late Ramjee Sahni resident of Village and PO- Chandpura, P.S.- Neema Chandpura, Distt- Begusarai ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mahasweta Chatterjee, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sajid Salim Khan- Sc25 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 28-07-2025 Heard the parties.
2. The present writ petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): (i) That an appropriate writ may be issued quashing the order issued vide Letter No.1073 dated-08.08.2016 issued under the signature of the Director Fisheries, Bihar, Patna, Respondent No-3 as contained in Annexure-17 whereby and where under the Respondent No-3 the
Patna High Court CWJC No.14187 of 2016(2) dt.28-07-2025 2/3 Director Fisheries has directed the District Fisheries Officer, Respondent NO-4 not to treat the patta issued infavour of Respondent NO-6 as valid and also take subsequent action in this regard. (ii) That an appropriate writ may be issued quashing the Letter No.327 dated- 11.08.2016 as contained in Annexure-18 issued by the District Fisheries Officer, Begusarai, Respondent NO-4 by which he has communicated the petitioner no.2 that in the light of the order passed by the Director Fisheries, Bihar, Patna, Respondent NO-3 the patta issued infavour of Respondent No- 6 cannot be treated as valid and also
directed him to accept revenue from Respondent NO-5 for the settlement year 2016-2017. (iii) That an appropriate writ may be issued commanding upon the Respondent NO-4 the District Fisheries Officer to accept the revenue from the petitioner society for the year 2016-2017 and to issue parwana immediately without any delay. (iv) That an appropriate writ may be issued commanding upon the Respondent No-4 the District Fisheries Officer not to take any action disturbing the possession of Respondent NO-6 during the pendency of this writ application.
Patna High Court CWJC No.14187 of 2016(2) dt.28-07-2025 3/3 (v) Any other relief/reliefs for which the petitioners are entitled too.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ has become infructuous and as such, he may be permitted to withdraw the petition.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.
Vijay Singh/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U