RAVI TOMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
BAIL/11270/2025 · 2025-11-21
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199458 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199458 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11270 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 285 of 2024, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C and Section 66(c) and 66(e) I.T Act, P.S. Kadipur, District- Sultanpur.
3. In terms of the FIR lodged on 28.06.2024, it was alleged that the applicant had got opened an account using forged documents like Aadhar card etc.
4. The contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the F.I.R has been lodged after about 5-6 years of the opening of the bank account using forged documents. The applicant is in custody since 26.09.2024 and he has no previous criminal antecedent, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail.
5. Learned A.G.A has opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the material on record as also the general nature of the allegations coupled with the fact that the applicant has no previous criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 26.09.2025, therefore, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.
7. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
8. Let the applicant Ravi Tomar be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashish Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ravi Tomar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 21, 2025 DiVYa BAIL No. 11270 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench