BHANU PRATAP SINGH @ VIRENDRA PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME GOVT. LKO.
BAIL/9986/2025 · 2025-10-15
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199441 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199441 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9986 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.300 of 2025, under Sections 80(2), 85 of BNS and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station Kotwali Sahar, District Hardoi.
3. It is argued by the Counsel for the applicant that the husband of the deceased Priyanshu Singh has been enlarged on bail vide order dated
09.10.2025. The applicant is the father in law of the deceased.
4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer.
5. Considering the fact that the allegations against the applicant to be similar to the co-accused, who has been enlarged on bail coupled with the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 13.09.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail on the ground of parity. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Bhanu Pratap Singh @ Virendra Pratap Singh be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on his furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajeet Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Bhanu Pratap Singh @ Virendra Pratap Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Govt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 15, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 9986 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench