[2025:RJ-JP:23277] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6787/2025 Jabbar Singh S/o Bal Singh, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Lambiya, Police Station Anandpur Kalu, District Beawar (Rajasthan) (At Present In District Jail Sikar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shyam Bihari Gautam For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.S. Shekhawat, AGA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA (V. J.) Order 16/06/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.76/2025 registered at Police Station Gokulpura, District Sikar for the offence punishable under Sections 8/18 of NDPS Act, 1985. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and the alleged recovered contraband i.e. Opium is below commercial quantity; charge-sheet has already been filed and the petitioner is in custody since 13.04.2025; the trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose and petitioner be released on bail. 3. Learned Additional Government Advocate has opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:23277] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6787/2025] 4. Heard learned counsel for both the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the arguments so advanced by the learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that the alleged recovered contraband is below commercial quantity; charge-sheet has already been filed, considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 13.04.2025 and trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, thus, without commenting any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow this bail application. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner Jabbar Singh S/o Bal Singh shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The petitioner shall not tamper with any evidence nor would influence the witnesses in the case. 8. It is made clear that the petitioner shall not involve in any offence(s) of similar nature during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in the first week of every two months in concerned policy station till trial is concluded. [2025:RJ-JP:23277] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6787/2025] 9. If any breach of these considerations is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. 10. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to mark their presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. (MANEESH SHARMA (V. J.)),J SOURAV /136