VINOD URAO v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO
/12237/2025 · 2025-12-08
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199439 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199439 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12237 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 411 of 2023, under sections 323, 304 IPC, P.S. Raniganj, District Pratapgarh. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that on 21.12.2023 the informant saw that the applicant was having a fight with wife and was beating her in the state of intoxication and when he tried to intervene the informant and her accomplice were hit by brick which resulted in death of accomplice of the informant. Cause of death as per post mortem report is ante mortem head injuries which includes two injuries on the eyebrow and the head. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that the informant and the witness had turned hostile in their statements. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the FIR allegations wherein allegations were levelled that the applicant was in the state of intoxication coupled with the fact that the informant and the witness have turned hostile, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 23.12.2023 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Seema Kashyap Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vinod Urao .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Let the applicant Vinod Urao be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with one surety, who shall be resident of state of Uttar Pradesh, of Rs.20,000/- to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
December 8, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 12237 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench