MOHD. SALMAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/7403/2025 · 2025-11-14
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199425 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199425 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7403 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. None appears for the informant despite notice. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 226 of 2025, under sections 333, 352, 351 (3), 64(1) BNS, Sections 67 IT Act, Sections 3/4 POCSO Act and Sections 3(2)(v) SC/ST Act, P.S. Kotwali Nagar, District Raebareli. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that for last one year the daughter of the informant aged about 15 years was being threatened. Threats of making some inappropriate videos viral were also levelled and on 21.5.2025 the applicant had committed wrong her and ran away. In the statement under Sections 180 and 183 BNSS the victim stated that she knew the applicant for last two years and used to talk to him which was opposed by the family members. In the statement under Section 183 BNSS she stated that around one year ago physical relation were also formed. The tentative age of the victim is around 19 years as disclosed in her statement under Section 183. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the age of the victim and apparent consent in the statement under Section 183 BNSS, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 11.6.2025 and has no Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sachin Verma, Praveen Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mohd. Salman .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Mohd.
Salman be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 14, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 7403 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench