HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1859 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Sri Krishna Pratap Singh, Advocate, has put in appearance on behalf of respondent No. 2 by filing his Vakalatnama, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and learned counsel for respondent no. 2. 3. This application has been filed mainly with the prayer to quash the impugned Cognizance order dated 27.01.2025 passed by the Special Judge, S.C & S.T Act, Raibareli, in S.S.T No. 294/2025 arises from Crime No 302/2024, U/s 76,352,351(2) BNS & 3(1) DA & DHA, 3(2)(V)(A), S.C & S.T. ACT. Police Station Harchandpur, District Raibarelli as well as entire proceeding of the S.S.T No. 294/2025 arises from Crime No 302/2024, U/s 76,352,351(2) BNS & 3(1) DA & DHA, 3(2) (V) (A), S.C & S.T. ACT. Police Station Harchandpur, District Raibarelli, State of U.P Versus Brijpal Lodhi and the impugned charge sheet in Crime No 302/2024, U/s 76,352,351(2) BNS & 3(1) DA & DHA, 3(2)(V) (A), S.C & S.T. ACT. Police Station Harchandpur, District Raibarelli thereto, contained as Annexure no. 1 to the application. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which is said to have taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as ANNEXURE NO. 8 to the application. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dilip Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Krishna Pratap Singh Brij Pal Lodhi .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the parties concerned to appear before the trial court concerned within 2 weeks from today alongwith original compromise and the trial court is directed to verify the compromise within next 6 weeks. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For a period of three months, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. 9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if it has been filed, to the learned counsel for the applicant, after taking the photocopy of the same. November 21, 2025 A.Nigam NA528 No. 1859 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench