Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 199411 (ALL)

RANJEETA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. MEDICAL HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/14923/2025 · 2025-12-19

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14923 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking mainly for the following relief(s):- "a. To issue an order or orders in the nature of mandamus to direct the opposite parties to include the name of the petitioner for training in SasnadeshSankhya प्ऴांकसं०- मा०िश०क०/ई-2 स्वा०पयर्० (ग)/ ्ऺिश०/2025-26/53194 िदनांक 03 नवम्बर 2025." 3. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before the authority concerned who shall consider and decide the same, within a period of four weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. 4. With aforesaid directions, petition stands disposed of. December 19, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sunita Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Ranjeeta .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Medical Health And Family Welfare Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench