VIKAS MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 4 OTHERS
BAIL/6524/2025 · 2025-10-27
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199400 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199400 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6524 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. No one appears for the informant despite notice.
2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.126 of 2025 under sections 70(2), 115(2), 351(3) BNS and section 5g/6 POCSO Act, and section 67-A IT Act, P.S. Kotwali Nagar, District Gonda.
3. The counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of the FIR it was alleged that the applicant had forced the victim for forming physical relations with the co-accused. It is also stated that subsequently, it is alleged that the applicant had also formed physical relations with the victim.
4. It is argued that the co-accused Sandeep Sonkar has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 22.07.2025.
5. Considering the fact that the main accused has been enlarged on bail and the medical on record does not corroborate the allegations, the applicant who is in custody since 18.02.2025 and the criminal history has been duly explained, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. Thus the bail application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Vikas Mishra be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manoj Kumar Misra, Aseem Samant Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vikas Mishra .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 4 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 27, 2025 VNP/- BAIL No. 6524 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench