KM. SHRADDHA PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.BASIC EDU.DEPTT.LUCKNOW and ORS.
WRIA/14039/2016 · 2025-11-21
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199398 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199398 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14039 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 21, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Surya Prakash Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rajeev Singh Chauhan (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Km. Shraddha Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Basic Edu.Deptt.Lucknow And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench