Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 199396 (ALL)

RAM PRABHAT SINGH v. KUMAR HARSH, DISTT. MAGISTRATE SULTANPUR DISTT. SULTANPUR

CAPL/2743/2025 · 2025-10-27

Manish Kumar

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2743 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. 1. Learned Standing Counsel on the basis of instruction received from the respondent - Kumar Harsh, District Magistrate, Sultanpur, has submitted that in compliance of judgement and order dated 7.1.2025 passed by the writ Court in PIL No. 1139 of 2024 a proceedings under Section 66 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 has been initiated. 2. On the other hand learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that till date no decision has been taken by the authorities by passing any order in the proceeding under Section 66 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. 3. The relevant extract of the order passed by the writ court is quoted hereinbelow: "4. In case the alternative remedy under law is availed of within a period of two weeks' from today by enclosing all the relevant material, the Competent Authority i.e. Collector shall consider the matter and set the proceedings in motion for necessary orders, if so warranted. It is expected that the proceedings shall be concluded expeditiously in accordance with law." 4. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and going through the order passed by the writ court, it is found that there was direction to the Collector to consider the matter and set the proceedings in motion and in pursuance thereof the case has been registered under Section 66 of U.P. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vinod Kumar, Shubham Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Ram Prabhat Singh .....Applicant(s) Kumar Harsh, Distt. Magistrate Sultanpur Distt. Sultanpur .....Opposite Party(s) Revenue Code, 2006 and except it there was no separate direction for conclusion of the proceedings within any stipulated time and only it is expected that the proceedings would be concluded expeditiously. Hence, there is no disobedience and the judgement and order passed by the writ court has been complied with and the contempt application has become infructuous and it is dismissed accordingly. 5. The notice, if any, issued against the respondent stands discharged. October 27, 2025 S. Kumar CAPL No. 2743 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench