Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 199392 (ALL)

JAGDEO PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. NAGAR VIKAS ANUBHAG LKO. AND ANOTHER

WRIA/14900/2025 · 2025-12-19

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14900 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri P.K. Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer: "Wherefore, it is respectfully and humbly prayed that the Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to: (i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to consider the case of the petitioner for transfer from district Khiri Lakhimpur Mohammadi Nagar Palika Parishad to any District Jaunpur "Nagar Palika Parishad Mungra Badshah or Nagar Palika Parishad Prayagraj range, Nagar Palika Parishad Bindki, District Fathepur, or Nagar Palika Parishad Bharvari, District Kaushambi or Nagar Palika parishad Chunar, District Mirazapur, in light of the provision of clause 5(v) of the government order dated 06-05-2025 within a stipulated period of time as prescribed by this Hon'ble Court, in the interest of justice. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner contained as annexure no. 5 to this writ petition." 3. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the ends of justice would sub-serve if, this Court allows the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the respondent no.2 Director, Nagar Nikay Nideshalay, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow and he may be directed direct Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhishek Patel Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Jagdeo Prasad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Nagar Vikas Anubhag Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) to consider and decide the same, within the time fixed by this Court. 4. Learned Additional Chief State Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. 5. Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose off this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation before the respondent no.2- Director, Nagar Nikay Nideshalay, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow ventilating his grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him enclosing therewith the copy of his earlier representation, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of 7 days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a further period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner, forthwith. December 19, 2025 V. Sinha WRIA No. 14900 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench