Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19938 (JHR)

SUMIT KUMAR MAHTO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./2234/2023 · 2025-08-28

Arun Kumar Rai, Sujit Narayan Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:25776-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 2234 of 2023 Sumit Kumar Mahto aged about 27 yrs. s/o- Gurudayal Mahto, R/o village- Harli, PO & PS Barkagaon, Dist.-Hazaribag (Jharkhand). …. --- Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Bisni Devi aged about 62 yrs., w/o- Guddan Mahto 3. Guddan Mahto aged about 64 yrs., s/o-Dukhan Mahto 4. Santosh Kumar aged about 35 yrs., s/o-Puran Mahto All 2 to 4 R/o- Behri, PO & PS- Muffasil, Dist.- Hazaribag. …. --- Opposite Parties --- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR RAI --- For the Petitioner: Mr. Pramod Kumar, Advocate For the State: Mr. Abhay Kr. Tiwari, Advocate --- 02 / 28.08.2025 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this petition with a liberty to file afresh as provided under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure corresponds to Section 413 of B.N.S.S. 2. The liberty, so sought for, is allowed. 3. The instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn, however, with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate Forum under the appropriate provision of law. 4. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) (Arun Kumar Rai, J.) R.K.M.