ROHIT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/9677/2025 · 2025-10-09
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199377 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199377 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9677 of 2025
Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State; Shri Sukhveer Singh, learned counsel for the complainant and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.58 of 2025, under Section 64, 352 BNS & 3/4 of POCSO Act, P.S. Bighapur, District Unnao. 3. The FIR in question was lodged alleging that daughter of the informant was enticed by the applicant and she has gone away with a lot of money from home. Subsequently, in the statement under Section 180 BNSS, the victim admitted that both the applicant and the victim used to talk on telephone and she had gone with the applicant and nothing wrong was done to her. However, in the statement under Section 183 BNSS, allegations of rape was also levelled. Medical report on record does not corroborate the allegation of rape. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the fact that the victim is aged about 16 years 8 months as per the high school marksheet and the statements under Section 180 & 183 BNSS are in huge contradiction without there being corroboration in the medical, the applicant who is in custody since 03.04.2025 and has no criminal antecedent, is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dheerendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rohit .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Let the applicant Rohit be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. 7.
7. However, the trial Court shall endeavour to decide the trial expeditiously without giving any unnecessary adjournment. October 9, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 9677 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench