Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 199376 (ALL)

RAJEEV KUMAR SINGH @ RAJEEV SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

BAIL/10118/2025 · 2025-11-21

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10118 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.1375 of 2019 under sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471, 120B IPC, P.S. Gomti Nagar, District Lucknow. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that co accused with similar allegations have been enlarged on bail. Copies of bail orders are collectively annexed as annexure 2 to the application. It is also argued that in similar cases the applicant has been granted bail in 30 out of 50 cases. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances and adopting the same reasoning, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 23.11.2021 is entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Rajeev Kumar Singh @ Rajeev Singh be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Syed Tamjeed Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rajeev Kumar Singh @ Rajeev Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 21, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 10118 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench