Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 199375 (MAD)

M.Jayanthi v. The Tahsildar,

WP/13907/2019 · 2025-11-14

T Vinod Kumar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.13907 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 14.11.2025 CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR W.P.No.13907 of 2019 and WMP.No.13968 of 2019 M.Jayanthi ... Petitioner vs 1. The Tahsildar, Vikkiravandi Taluk, Vikkiravandi, Villupuram District. 2. D.Sathiyaraj … Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of order of first respondent bearing proceedings in Na.Ka.No.A5/3875/2018, dated 23.02.2019 and quash the same and consequently, direct the first respondent herein to appoint the petitioner in the post of Village Assistant at Thennavarayanpattu, Vikkiravandi Taluk, Villupuram and pass orders. For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mrs.V.Yamunadevi Special Government Pleader for R1 : Mr.S.Vijayakumar for Mr.G.Bharadwaj for R2 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.13907 of 2019 O R D E R On 25.10.2025, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he has given up vakalath in the matter. Thus, this Court directed the matter to be listed on 03.11.2025, to enable the learned counsel for the petitioner to file a memo to the above effect. 2. On 03.11.2025, the learned counsel for the petitioner who had filed writ petition filed a memo informing this Court of he having given up vakalath in the matter. Thus, Registry was directed to delete the name of the learned counsel for the petitioner and reflect the name of the petitioner on the next date of hearing i.e., on 10.11.2025. 3. On 10.11.2025, despite the name of the petitioner shown in the cause list, there was no representation for the petitioner or alternate counsel and thus, this Court directed the matter to be listed on 14.11.2025 under the caption “for dismissal”. 4. Today, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the petitioner either in person or through alternate counsel. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.13907 of 2019 5. In view of the above, this Court is of the view that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter and accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. No costs. 14.11.2025 Speaking order / Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No dh To The Tahsildar, Vikkiravandi Taluk, Vikkiravandi, Villupuram District. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.13907 of 2019 T. VINOD KUMAR , J. dh W.P.No.13907 of 2019 14.11.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis