SADDAM BEG v. U.P. JAL NIGAM THRU SECY. UP LUCKNOW AND OTHERS
WRIA/338/2017 · 2025-10-27
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199357 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199357 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 338 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. October 27, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Muneer Ahmad Counsel for Respondent(s) : I.P. Singh (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Saddam Beg .....Petitioner(s) U.P. Jal Nigam Thru Secy. Up Lucknow And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench