Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 199350 (ALL)

TEJ KUMAR SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY., DEPTT. OF DAIRY DEVELOPMENT, LKO. AND OTHERS

WRIA/15141/2025 · 2025-12-19

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15141 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Sri Anagh Shukla, Advocate, has put in appearance by way of filing Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite parties no. 2 to 4. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Brijendra Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State, Sri Anagh Shukla, learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 2 to 4, Sri Shanker Lal, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 5, Sri Pankaj Patel, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 6 and perused the record. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs :- "1) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties no. 2 and 3 to make payment of arrears of difference of salary to the petitioners because of the benefit of first promotional pay scale on completion of 14 years of continuous satisfactory services in pursuance of the orders dated 09.10.2024 and 25.09.2021 corrected on 16.09.2023 contained as Annexure No. 3 and 4 to the writ petition. 2) To issue a writ order or direction in nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties no. 2 and 3 to make the above payment along with interest at the rate of 18% per annum with effect from the date the benefit of first promotional pay scale on completion of 14 years of continuous satisfactory services becomes due up till date of actual payment to the petitioners." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioners to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 3/Managing Director, Pradeshik Cooperative Dairy Federation Ltd., Lucknow and the opposite party no. 3 may be directed to consider and decide the same within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prashant Chandra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Patel, Sandeep Sharma, Shanker Lal Tej Kumar Singh And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy., Deptt. Of Dairy Development, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties have no objection to the contentions aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case,the petitioners are given liberty to move a fresh representation, while raising all their claims and grounds before the opposite party no. 3/Managing Director, Pradeshik Cooperative Dairy Federation Ltd., Lucknow within a period of 15 days form today and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the opposite party no. 3 is directed to consider and decide the same within further period of eight weeks, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is hereby disposed of. December 19, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 15141 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench