SHRAVAN KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME LKO.
BAIL/8680/2025 · 2025-10-10
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199342 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199342 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8680 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Counter affidavit filed today is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 90 of 2025, under Sections 80(2), 85 BNS and Sections 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Kaisarganj, District Bahraich.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that the FIR in question was lodged alleging that the daughter of the informant was married to the applicant and she was killed on account of non payment of dowry. The cause of death could not be ascertained as per the post mortem report and the viscera was preserved.
5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the fact that there is no material to suggest causing incidence on the applicant coupled with the fact that the co accused mother in law and father in law have been enlarged on bail, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in custody since 26.6.2025 having no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
7. Let the applicant Shravan Kumar be released on bail in aforesaid FIR Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nalin Arora, Anubhav Singh, Ramesh Kumar Pal Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Shravan Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 10, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 8680 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench