ABDUL QAYYUM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES LKO.andORS.
WRIA/6861/2018 · 2025-12-08
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199335 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199335 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 6861 of 2018 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. December 8, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mohammad Babar Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Abdul Qayyum .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Cooperative Societies Lko.Andors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench