Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19933 (GAU)

ANGSHUMAN PUZARI AND 2 ORS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS

WP(C)/5779/2025 · 2025-09-24

Kalyan Rai Surana, Susmita Phukan Khaund

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010219982025 2025:GAU-AS:13307-DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5779/2025 ANGSHUMAN PUZARI AND 2 ORS S/O- KRISHNA PUZARI, R/O- A.T. ROAD, NEAR LAHOTI PETROL PUMP, DERGAON, WARD NO. 4, P.O. AND P.S. DERGAON, DIST. GOLAGHAT, ASSAM 2: SMTI SHRUTIDHARA GOUTAM W/O- ANGSHUMAN PUZARI R/O- A.T. ROAD NEAR LAHOTI PETROL PUMP DERGAON WARD NO. 4 P.O. AND P.S. DERGAON DIST. GOLAGHAT ASSAM 3: DEBASISH PUZARI S/O- KRISHNA PUZARI R/O- A.T. ROAD NEAR LAHOTI PETROL PUMP DERGAON WARD NO. 4 P.O. AND P.S. DERGAON DIST. GOLAGHAT ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6. 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT OF HOME Page No.# 2/3 DISPUR GUWAHATI-6. 3:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE ASSAM ULUBARI GUWAHATI-7. 4:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE GOLAGHAT P.O. P.S. AND DIST. GOLAGHAT ASSAM PIN- 785621. 5:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE GOLAGHAT POLICE STATION P.O. P.S. AND DIST. GOLAGHAT ASSAM PIN- 785621. 6:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE SARUPATHAR POLICE STATION P.O. AND P.S. SARUPATHAR DIST. GOLAGHAT ASSAM PIN- 785601. 7:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE BORPATHAR POLICE STATION P.O. AND P.S. BORPATHAR DIST. GOLAGHAT ASSAM PIN- 785602. 8:THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE DERGAON POLICE STATION P.O. AND P.S. DERGAON DIST. GOLAGHAT ASSAM PIN- 785614 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR S H SIKDAR, MD S HOQUE,MS N J BEGUM Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND ORDER Date : 25.09.2025 (K.R. Surana, J) Heard Mr. S.H. Sikdar, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. P. Sarmah, learned Additional Senior Govt. Advocate for the State respondents. After some deliberations, the learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw this writ petition. Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal. JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant