Chakali Mohan, v. The Andhra Pragathi Grameena Bank,
WP/12897/2018 · 2025-03-06
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19933 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19933 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010279562018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION No. 12897 of 2018 Between: Chakali Mohan, ...PETITIONER AND The Andhra Pragathi Grameena Bank and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. D RAMAKRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. V UMA DEVI
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
“.... to declare the action of the respondents in not accepting the application/bio data form of the petitioner for considering his candidature for recruitment to the post of Office Attendant Multipurpose Cadre and not considering of candidature of the petitioner to the post of Office Attendant Multipurpose Cadre pursuant to the Notification issued by the respondents as illegal arbitrary unjust unreasonable and contrary to the Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently, direct the respondents to accept the application/bio data form of the petitioner for considering his candidature for recruitment to the post of Office Attendant Multipurpose Cadre pursuant to the Notification issued by the respondents immediately in the interest of justice and appoint the petitioner as Office Attendant Multipurpose Cadre with all consequential benefits.”
2
2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption
“For Dismissal”.
3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption “For dismissal”, none represented for the Petitioner today.
4. Learned Counsel for respondents is in attendance.
5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No
order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/*
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 12897 of 2018
06.03.2025
Mjl /*