Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 199326 (ALL)

RAJKALI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO.

BAIL/8687/2025 · 2025-10-10

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8687 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and Sri Prem Kumar who appears for the informant. 2. The accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR/Case Crime No.122 of 2025 under section 108 BNS, P.S. Harchandpur, District Rae Bareli. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the son of the informant was married to the daughter of the applicant and there used to be substantial fight in between them. Subsequently, it was alleged that when the son of the informant had gone to his matrimonial family, the entire matrimonial family including his wife had killed the son of the informant. The cause of death as per the postmortem report is antemortem hanging and apart from the ligature mark, abrasions were seen between the right ear. The applicant herein is the mother in law of the deceased. 4. The counsel for the informant states that the entire matrimonial family had killed the deceased and had thrown the body at a substantial distance. 5. Considering the material on record and the postmortem report, which indicates the cause of death as antemortem hanging and there being nothing specific against the applicant who is the mother in law and is in custody since 30.05.2025 having no criminal history is entitled for the bail. Thus the bail application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Rajkali be released on bail in aforesaid FIR/Case Crime Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jaikaran, Saurabh Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rajkali .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Number subject to his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 10, 2025 VNP/- BAIL No. 8687 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench