SHRI DHARMENDRA KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME, LUCKNOW AND 4 OTHERS
A482/6247/2023 · 2025-10-27
Rajeev Bharti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199311 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199311 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 6247 of 2023 Court No. - 23 HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
1. Case called out.
2. Learned counsel for the applicant is neither present, nor any request for the adjournment of the case has been made on his behalf. However, learned A.G.A for the State is present.
3. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
5. A copy of this order be sent to the court concerned for necessary action. October 27, 2025 DiVYa Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Brij Bhushan Singh, Pranjal Apurva, Sandeep Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Rajeev Bharti,J.) Shri Dharmendra Kumar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home, Lucknow And 4 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench