2025:JHHC:12890-DB IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (PIL) No. 4139 of 2024 Ishwar Gorain, aged about-44 years, Son of Bhagirath Gorain, Resident of Village- Inathpur, P.O. Nagri, P.S. Kundahit, District- Jamtara … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through its Chief Secretary, Office situated at Project Building Dhurwa, P.O. & P.S. Dhurwa, District- Ranchi (Jharkhand) 2. Principal Secretary, Department Personnel and Administrative Reforms, At Project Building Dhurwa, P.O. P.S. Dhurwa, District- Ranchi 3. The Principle Secretary, Department of Primary Education Directorate At, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.S. District-Ranchi P.S. Dhurwa, 4. The Secretary, Department of Schooling Education and Literacy At, Project Building, Dhurwa, P.S. & P.S. Dhurwa, District-Ranchi 5. The Director, Project Council Jharkhand, at New Education Cooperative Building, Shyamali Colony, P.O. Doranda, District-Ranchi -834024 6. The Joint Director, Regional Education Department, Santhal Pargana Sub- Division At, Dumka, P.O. & P.S. Dumka, District-Dumka, (Jharkhand) 7. The Deputy Commissioner At, Jamtara, P.O. & P.S. Jamtara, District- Jamtara, (Jharkhand) 8. The District Education Officer Cum-District Programme Officer, District Education Project At, Jamtara, P.O. & P.S. Jamtara, District-Jamtara, (Jharkhand) 9. The District Education Superintendent Cum-At, Jamtara, P.O. & P.S. Jamtara, District-Jamtara, (Jharkhand) 10. The Block Development Officer-cum- the President, the Block Level Education Committee At, Block Jamtara, P.O. & P.S. Jamtara, District- Jamtara, (Jharkhand) 11. Sri Aditya Mandal, Assistant Teacher Utkrmait Ucch Madhaya Vidayala Sundarpur, Nala, P.Ο. & P.S. Nala District-Jamtara, (Jharkhand) ... Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR --------- For the Petitioner: Mr. S.K. Vishwakarma, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Gaurav Raj, A.C. to A.A.G.-II Mr. Krishna Murari, Advocate Mr. Raj Vardhan, Advocate --------- 05/Dated: 29.04.2025 M.S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J.(Oral) 1. This P.I.L. relates to a service dispute and it is not maintainable in view of the judgments of the Supreme Court which have held that in service cases, there cannot be a P.I.L. 2. Therefore, this P.I.L. is dismissed. (M.S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J.) (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Manoj/Pramanik/Cp.2