ANNU @ ANURAG YADAV AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ITS PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A483/992/2025 · 2025-12-19
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199266 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199266 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 992 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. The present application has been with the following prayer:-
"To direct learned Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Lucknow to decide S.T. No. 385 of 2013 (State of U.P. Vs. Annu @ Anurag Yadav & Ors.) arising out of Case Crime No. 381 of 2001 u/s 504, 506 I.P.C. and 3(1)(x) SC/ST Act, P.S. Madiyaon, Lucknow, expeditiously, within a stipulated period."
3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that only prayer of the applicants is that a direction may be issued to decide the aforesaid case expeditiously.
4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the innocuous prayer of the applicants.
5. In view of the above, without entering into merits of the case, I hereby direct the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Lucknow to decide the S.T. No. 385 of 2013 (State of U.P. Vs. Annu @ Anurag Yadav & Ors.) arising out of Case Crime No. 381 of 2001 u/s 504, 506 I.P.C. and 3(1)(x) SC/ST Act, P.S. Madiyaon, Lucknow, in accordance with law, expeditiously, without giving any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Prateek Tewari Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Annu @ Anurag Yadav And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
6. In view of the aforesaid terms, the application U/s 483 Cr.P.C. stands disposed of. December 19, 2025 Arpan A483 No. 992 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench