Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 199259 (ALL)

ANKUSH SINGH (IN FIR ANKUSH KUMAR SINGH) v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND 5 OTHERS

CRLP/9680/2025 · 2025-10-17

Abdul Moin, Babita Rani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9680 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J. 1. Heard. 2. At the very outset, learned AGA on the basis of instructions states that subsequent to lodging of the FIR, Sections 5/6 of the POCSO Act and Section 65(2) of B.N.S. have also been added. 4. Upon the same being pointed out, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not intend to press the petition and prays that the same may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to pursue appropriate remedy as may be available to him under law. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. October 17, 2025 A. Katiyar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rahul Roshan Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Ankush Singh (In Fir Ankush Kumar Singh) .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench