BEBI SONI @ BEBI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/1941/2025 · 2025-12-10
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199256 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199256 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1941 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State. Notice to respondent No.2 is dispensed with, in view of the proposed order. 2.The present application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case crime No.0257 of 2025 under sections 3(5), 333, 109, 352, 351(2) BNS, P.S. Badosaray, district Barabanki. 3.Learned counsel for applicant submits that cross cases have been lodged by both side(s). From the side of the accused applicant, five persons are injured and from complainant's side, four persons are injured. 4.Learned A.G.A. submits that it is not a case of false implication. He submits that total five persons are injured in this case. One of the injured has been referred to district hospital. The incident is admitted. The complicity of the applicant has been alleged by five injured in their statement under section 161 CrPC. 5.On due consideration to the fact that five persona are injured in this case, cross first information reports have been registered by both side(s) and the injuries received by injured persons alleging complicity of the applicant, it cannot be said that it is a case of false implication. No case for anticipatory bail is made out. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ram Raj Ojha, Sonu Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Bebi Soni @ Bebi .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
6.The application is rejected. However, it is provided that in case the applicant files a regular bail application within two weeks from today, the same be decided expeditiously, strictly in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in tSatender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021. December 10, 2025 kkb/ NABAIL No. 1941 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench