Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 199251 (ALL)

SUSHANT SINGH v. THE CHIEF INFORMATION COMMISSIONER U.P. RTI BHAWAN LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/10004/2025 · 2025-10-15

Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10004 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner has prayed for the issuance of a Writ of mandamus commanding the respondent no.1-Chief Information Commissioner, Lucknow to dispose of the second appeal of petitioner within a stipulated time. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent no.1 submits that the petitioner has filed the second appeal in a physical form and not on the web portal as is required under the law. 4. In the light of the above, we direct the petitioner to file the second appeal on the web portal within seven days. 5. In the event such an appeal is filed by the petitioner within the period indicated above, the respondent no.1-Chief Information Commissioner, Lucknow, U.P., is directed to consider and decide the said appeal by way of passing a reasoned order in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from the date of filing of the said appeal. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. October 15, 2025 Arjun/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajiv Srivastava, Baldau Ji Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Shikhar Anand, Shubham Tripathi (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Sushant Singh .....Petitioner(s) The Chief Information Commissioner U.P. Rti Bhawan Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARJUN PRASAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench