CMP No. 19370 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30-10-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR CMP No. 19370 of 2021 IN SA NO. 1245 OF 2008 The Tamil Nadu Industrial Investments Corporation Ltd. Rep By Its Branch Manager Mr R.Govindaraj, Sri Lakshi Complex, Ist Floor No 4/22 Omalur Main Road Salem- 4. Appellant(s) Vs PALANIYAMMAL W/o.Palani Gounder, Sakiph Kattu, Puthur, Sevathur-po, Thirupattur Taluk, North Arcot Dist. Respondent(s) For Respondent(s): M/s.N.Manokaran For R16 To R18 And R20 To R22 Cmp 19370, 19380 And 19381/2021 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 19370 of 2021 ----------- R19 - Died Pvt Notice ---------- https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 19370 of 2021 ORDER This petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 1637 days in bringing on record the Lrs of the deceased twelfth respondent. 2.On a perusal of the affidavit filed in support of this petition, it discloses that R12 died on 24.04.2015 i.e., during the pendency of the present second appeal and the same was not within the knowledge of the petitioner/appellant. 3.According to the petitioner, the same came to the knowledge of the petitioner only on 28.06.2021 when the second respondent and the counsel for the respondents furnished the particulars of the Lrs of the deceased twelfth respondent. Thus the petitioner claimed knowledge about the death of the twelfth respondent only on 28.06.2021 and immediately, thereafter, i.e., on 24.08.2021, the present petition has been filed along with the petitions to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of R12 and bring on record the Lrs of the deceased R12. If the Limitation is counted from the date of knowledge https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 19370 of 2021 of the petitioner and the same may be within 90 days. 4.However, the second respondent opposed this petition on the ground that the petitioner/appellant has full knowledge about the death of R12, immediately, when the notices that were sent to R12, were returned un-served. Though an elaborate counter affidavit has been filed, no date is furnished and no specific averrment is made with regard to the knowledge of the petitioner/appellant about the death of R12. As already noted above, R12 died in the year 2015, whereas, the present second appeal was filed in the year 2008. 5.Therefore, in the considered view of this Court, notices must have been dispatched to the respondents during the year 2008-09 as death of R12 is only in the year 2015. Therefore, it cannot be accepted that the petitioner/appellant has knowledge about the death of R12 in the year 2015 itself. R2 also disputed that the delay calculated by the petitioner/appellant as 1637 days and contended that the actual delay is 2855 days. Whatsoever be the delay, the reason assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition is on https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 19370 of 2021 the knowledge of the death of R12 and petition has been filed within 90 days of such knowledge. 6.The learned counsel for the second respondent placed reliance on the decisions of the Hon'ble Apex Court to oppose the relief, namely (2011) 4SCC363 and (2010) 8 SCC 685. In the case of Lanka Venkateswarlu(dead) by Lrs Vs.State of Andhra Pradesh and Others, the Hon'ble Apex Court has considered the case, where after intimation of the death of the respondent and the particulars of LRs were also furnished, there was abnormal delay of 1637 days, in bringing on record the Lrs of the deceased respondent. But in the instant case, the petition has been filed well within 90 days from the date of intimation furnished by the respondents to the petitioner/appellant. Therefore, there is no sufficient cause in the above said decision. In so far as the case of Balwant Singh(dead) Vs. Jagdish Singh and Others is concerned, the Hon'ble Apex Court considered the non-existence of the sufficient cause. 7.In the instant case, the reason assigned by the petitioner/appellant https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 19370 of 2021 in affidavit filed in support of this petition is that the knowledge about the death of R12 to the petitioner /appellant is only on 28.06.2021, when the intimation was given by the second respondent to the petitioner/appellant. Therefore, the length of delay is totally immaterial as there is sufficient cause. However, this Court is of the considered view that the delay can be condoned subject to payment of reasonable costs. 8.Accordingly, this petition is allowed subject to the condition that the petitioner /appellant pays a sum of Rs.5000/- to the learned counsel for the second respondent namely Ms.K.Megala, learned counsel representing Mr.N.Manokaran, learned counsel on record, within a period of four weeks from today. 30-10-2025 dn To 1.PALANIYAMMAL W/o.Palani Gounder, Sakiph Kattu, Puthur, Sevathur-po, Thirupattur Taluk, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 19370 of 2021 North Arcot Dist. 2.RAMASWAMY W/o.Raja Gounder, Raja Muthaliar Kottam, Puthur, Sevathur-po, Thirupattur Taluk, North Arcot Dist. 3.RANGANATHAN S/o.Raja Gounder, Raja Muthaliar Kottam, Puthur, Sevathur-po, Thirupattur Taluk, North Arcot Dist. 4.THANKAVELU S/o.Chinna Gounder, No.1 And 2, Maragaundan Valavu, Olakkachinnur Po, Vaikundam Village, Sangagiri Taluk, Salem Dist. 5.SELLAMMAL D/o.Chinna Gounder, W/o. Thankavelu, Kollinchi Kattur, Olakkachinnur Po, Vaikundam Village, Sangagiri Tk, Salem Dist. 6.CHINNAMMAL D/o.Sellappa Gounder, W/o. Chinnan Gounder, Pancha Goundalur, Kasthuripatti Village, Sangagiri Tk, Salem Dist. 7.Catholic Syrian Bank Ltd. Branch Manager, Erode Road, Erode 8.RAJAMMAL W/o.Late Raja Gounder, Mosagaundan Valaivu, Olakkachinnur Po, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 19370 of 2021 Vaikundam Village, Sangagiri Tk, Salem Dist. 9.ATHAYEE W/o.Palani Gounder, Chakip Kadu, Puthu, Sevathur Po, Thirupattur Tk, North Arcot Dist. 10.SELLAMMAL W/o.Marappah Gounder, Veerakkadu, Valakuttai, Vaikundam Village, Sangagiri Tk, Salem Dist. 11.VARUDHAYEE D/o.Kaneshan Alice Ramaswamy, Rasamuthaliar, Puthu, Sevathur Po, Thirupattur Tk, North Arcot Dist. 12.ALAGAMMAL W/o.Palanivel, Echampalayam, Vaikundam Village, Sangagiri Tk, Salem Dist. 13.MUTHAYEE W/o.Ramaswamy, Ramaswamy Kattu, Erukalur Village, Sangagiri Tk, Salem Dist. 14.Palani Gounder, Door No.7/42, Thekkuthottam, Kannurapatti, Po Via Nathamedu, Puduchathiram-637104 15.P.Mohanvel https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 19370 of 2021 S/o.Palani Gounder, Door No.7/42, Thekkuthottam, Kannurapatti, Po Via Nathamedu, Puduchathiram-637104 16.SAMPOORNAM W/o.Venkatesh Door No.7/42, Thekkuthottam, Kannurapatti, Po Via Nathamedu, Puduchathiram-637104 17.C.Ramasamy S/o.Chinnan Gounder, Panjagoundanur, Kasturipatti Village, Sangagiri Tk, Salem District 18.C.Rajammal W/o.Ramasamy, Pappankadu, Maravampalayam, Vadugapatti Post, Sangagiri Tk, Salem District 19.R.Palanivel S/o.Ramasamy Gounder, Echampalayam, Kedikkaval Village, Sangagiri Tk, Salem District 20.P.Pappa W/o.Chandrasekaran, Echampalayam, Kedikkaval Village, Sangagiri Tk, Salem District 21.P.Jothi W/o.Kandasamy, Echampalayam, Kedikkaval Village, Sangagiri Tk, Salem District 22.P.Madhappan S/o.Palanivel, Echampalayam, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 19370 of 2021 Kedikkaval Village, Sangagiri Tk, Salem District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CMP No. 19370 of 2021 MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR J. dn CMP No. 19370 of 2021 IN SA NO. 1245 OF 2008 30-10-2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis