SMT. NAGHMA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/10662/2025 · 2025-11-15
Abdul Moin, Babita Rani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199247 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199247 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 10662 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned AGA appearing for respondents No. 1 to 3.
2. No notice is being issued to the respondent No.4 taking into consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed.
3. Instant petition has been filed praying for a mandamus commanding the respondents not to harass the petitioners and not to disturb their personal liberty and life.
4. The contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that the petitioners are residing together but the respondent authorities are harassing the petitioner and their family members. The specific averments are contained in paragraph 16 of the writ petition.
5. On the other hand, learned AGA states on the basis of the instructions sent by Sub Inspector, Police Station Auras District Unnao dated 12.11.2025 that there is no FIR, which has been registered against the petitioners and that the petitioners also not being harassed in any manner.
6. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of. . (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) November 15, 2025 Reena/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Syed Husain Abbas, Irfan Khan, Irshad Ali Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A.
Smt. Naghma And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- REENA KANNAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench