HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1701 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Anurag Kumar Singh, Advocate on behalf of opposite party no. 2 is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the complainant as well as learned A.G.A for the State. 2. The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No. 218 of 2025, under sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 109, 115(2), 351(3), 352 B.N.S and Section 27 Arms Act, P.S. Harchandpur, District Raebareli. 3. It is alleged in the prosecution case that on 15.8.2025, Dhirendra Singh called upon complainant's son Prashant Singh as well as his nephew Sudhir Singh on the shop at 11.30 in the morning and regarding the transaction relating to the shop, disputed erupted and he started hurling abuses. When the son and the nephew of the complainant asked him not to abuse, quarrel escalated and Ashok Singh called his brother Dhirendra and Ajeet. It is also alleged that Ajeet came firing from double barrel 12 bore gun in the lane along with two other persons and kept on firing. On the other side of the lane, Dhirendra Singh armed with danda and pistol came and also started firing on them. Somehow, the son and nephew of the complainant saved their life. Both have suffered injuries. Bystanders of the market have also suffered injuries. 4. The submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that none has been injured from the complainant's side. It is submitted by the applicant's counsel that on the contrary, grievous injuries have been sustained by Ashok Singh, the co-accused who has been granted regular bail in Criminal Misc Bail Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rajesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Dhirendra Singh @ Dhirendra Pratap Singh And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home U.P. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Application No. 10469 of 2025, vide order dated 29.10.2025, the bail order is contained as Annexure No. 10 to the bail application. The injuries have also been caused to the applicant, co-accused namely Ajeet, Ashok Singh. The co- accused Ashok Singh remained admitted in All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raebareli from 15.08.2025 to 03.09.2025. 5. Learned A.G.A., on the other hand, has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail. 6. Learned counsel for the complainant has submitted that argument that no one is injured from the side of the complainant is false as injuries have been sustained. The co-accused persons have been seen firing in the CCTV footage, which is a part of the case diary. It cannot be said that the it is a case of false implication. Three persons have been seen involved in the incident in the CCTV footage, firing in a narrow lane. The injuries received by the injured as also the statement of the eye witness corroborates with the prosecution story. 7. Perused the record. 8. The learned trial court, while deciding the bail application, has observed as under:- " प्ऴावली के पिरशीलन से स्प्ि है िक वादी मुकदमा के पु्ऴ ्ऺशान्त िसह एवं भतीजे सुधीर िसह को दुकान के लेनदेन की बात को लेकर अिभयु्वगण ्षारा अपने भाइयों के साथ िमलकर दो नाली लाइसेंस बन्दूक एवं िपस्टल लेकर फायर करने तथा लाठी डण्डा से पीटकर गम्भीर चोटें पहुँचाये जाने का अिभयोग है। वादी मुकदमा ्षारा बयान अन्तगर्त धारा 161 दं०्ऺ०सं० में ्ऺथम सूचना िरपोटर् में विणत तथ्यों का समथर्न िकया गया है। ्ऺथम सूचना िरपोटर् में अिभयु्वगण के ्षारा बंदूक से फायर िकये जाने का कथन है। घटना में कई अन्य लोगों को भी फायर की चोट आने का उल्लेख ्ऺथम सूचना िरपोटर् में है। घटना में घायल ्िि्व राजेन््श कु मार, मयंक वमार्, आशुतोष गुप्ता, शरफराज अहमद व आनन्द की आघात आख्या उपलब्ध है िजन्होंने बयान अन्तगर्त धारा 161 दं०्ऺ०सं० में उ्व घटना में अिभयु्वगणगण ्षारा चलायी गयी गोली के पिरणाम स्वरूप चोट जाना स्वीकार िकया है एवं उनका इलाज एम्स में चलना बताया है। ्ऺस्तुत घटना में उभयप्षों को चोटें आने का उल्लेख िववेचक ्षारा डायरी में िकया गया है, िजसमें उभयप्षों के शरीर के ममर्स्थल पर अ्षेन्यास््ऴ की चोटें आना दिशत हैं। अतः मामले के तथ्यों, पिरिस्थितयों में अपराध की ्ऺकृ ित की गम्भीरता, उभयप्षों के बीच िववाद की िस्थित, चोटिहलों को आयी चोटों की ्ऺकृ ित तथा संख्या को दृि्िगत रखते हुए आधार जमानत पयार्प्त नहीं है। अतः आवेदक / अिभयु्वगण ्षारा ्ऺस्तुत अि्षम जमानत ्ऺाथर्नाप्ऴ स्वीकार िकये जाने योग्य नहीं है। आदेश आवेदक /अिभयु्वगण धीरेन््श िसह, अजीत िसह ्षारा अपराध संख्या 218/2025, धारा-191(2), 191(3), 190, 109, 115(2), 351 (3), 352 बी.एन.एस. एवं धारा 27 आयुध अिधिनयम, थाना हरचन्दपुर, िजला रायबरेली के मामले में ्ऺस्तुत अि्षम जमानत ्ऺाथर्नाप्ऴ िनरस्त िकया जाता है। " 6. Upon due consideration to the gravity of the offence, the fact that cross NABAIL No. 1701 of 2025 2 F.I.Rs have been registered and both sides have sustained injuries, five persons namely Rajendra Kumar, Mayank Verma, Ashutosh Gupta, Sharfaraz Ahmad and Anand have received fire arm injuries, the incident is admitted thus, it cannot be said that it is a case of false implication, I do not find it a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. 7. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail stands rejected. November 14, 2025 DiVYa NABAIL No. 1701 of 2025 3 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench