1 2025:CGHC:19705 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2144 of 2025 1 - Bhuneshwar Ram Paikara S/o Late Jagarnath Aged About 70 Years R/o Village - Ghunchapur, Tehsil - Udaypur, Sarguja, District - Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Collector Sarguja, District - Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Tehsildar Tehsil - Udaypur, Sarguja, District - Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Saket Pandey, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Santosh Bharat, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 30/04/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 reliefs:- “10.1. That, the Hon'ble Court may kindly call for records pertaining to case of the petitioners. 10.2. That the Hon'ble Court may kindly direct the respondent authorities to register the application dated 07/01/2025 preferred by the petitioner for mutation of his name in land records under section 109 and 110 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code 1959, in the interest of justice. 10.3. That, any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deemed just and fit in facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has purchased the land which is situated at Village- Sontarai, P.h. No. 12, Tahsil, Udaypur, bearing Khasra No. 664/13, area 0.202 hectare way back on 18.06.2002 through registered sale deed, however, the petitioner could not got mutated the said land in his name. Thereafter, on 07th January, 2025, the petitioner has moved an application before the Tahsildar, Udaypur, District- Sarguja, however, his application not registered by the the concerned Tahsildar and no orders have been passed. 3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State submits that if the petitioner has moved an application, the concerned Tahsildar should have registered the case and should have initiated the proceedings upon the demarcation as per Section 109 and 3 Section 110 of the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, 1959. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and the limited prayer made by the petitioner, the Tahsildar- Udaypur, District- Sarguja is directed to consider the said application, register the same and to proceed further in accordance with law and to pass appropriate orders within a period of 45 days. Since the application has been filed way back on 07th January, 2025 as such the concerned Tahsildar is under obligation to register and decide the same in accordance with law. 6. With this observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat