Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 199230 (ALL)

SMT. RAJRANI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. MINISTRY HOME AFFAIRS LKO. AND 8 OTHERS

WRIC/9596/2025 · 2025-10-06

Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9596 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Ms. Priyanka Nag, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the present writ petition has now become infructuous as the cause of action is no more survive. 2. In light of the submission made above, the writ petition be consigned to record. 3. The writ petition is disposed of without passing any further orders. October 6, 2025 cks/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shaiphali Nag, Priyanka Nag Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Smt. Rajrani .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Ministry Home Affairs Lko. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA KANT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench