HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 33959 of 2019 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J. 1. None appears for the petitioner. 2. We have perused the relief clause and heard Shri S.B. Pandey, learned Senior Counsel and Deputy Solicitor General of India for Union of India and Shri Shobhit Mohan Shukla, learned counsel for the opposite party nos. 3 and 4, who jointly say that the writ petition has outlived its utility, as, the Defence Expo has already been held and no trees were cut. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. November 21, 2025 R.K.P. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Moti Lal Yadavin Person Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., A.S.G., Namit Sharma, Ratnesh Chandra, Shailendra Singh Chauhan, Shobhit Mohan Shukla, Sudeep Seth (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Moti Lal Yadav .....Petitioner(s) U.O.I.Thru.Secy.Ministry Of Defence New Delhi And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench