Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 199224 (ALL)

M/S LALLITE FILLING CENTRE THRU. ITS PROPRIETOR SMT. VIJAYA KIRTI AND ANOTHER v. ARVINDER SINGH SAHNEY, CHAIRMAN NEW DELHI AND 2 OTHERS

CAPL/2747/2025 · 2025-10-27

Manish Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2747 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. 1. Respondent No.2 has filed compliance affidavit, which is taken on record. 2. Learned counsel for Respondent No.2 has submitted that in compliance of judgement and order passed by the writ court the order has been passed after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned. 3. On the other hand learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the decision dated 7.8.2025 taken by the authority in compliance of the judgement and order passed by the writ court was sent on wrong address and it was never received by the applicant, hence the judgement and order passed by the writ court has not been complied with. 4. After haring learned counsel for the parties, the only objection of learned counsel for the applicant is that the decision dated 7.8.2025 taken by the authorities in compliance of judgement and order passed in the writ petition was sent on the wrong address but he has not disputed the fact that the order has been passed after providing the opportunity of hearing to the parties. 5. Once the decision has been taken by the authorities concerned in compliance of judgement and order passed by the writ court which has not been disputed by the learned counsel for the applicant and admitted Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manish Misra, Gaurav Upadhyay Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : M/S Lallite Filling Centre Thru. Its Proprietor Smt. Vijaya Kirti And Another .....Applicant(s) Arvinder Singh Sahney, Chairman New Delhi And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) that the same has been passed after providing opportunity of hearing, the contempt application has become infructuous and it is dismissed as such. 6. Notice, if any, issued against the respondent is discharged. October 27, 2025 S. Kumar CAPL No. 2747 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar,J.) Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench