Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 199212 (ALL)

SATYENDRA SINGH v. DIRECTOR RAJYA KRISHI UTTPADAN MANDI PARISHAD LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/13494/2025 · 2025-11-21

Shree Prakash Singh

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13494 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Vakalatnama filed by Mr. Syed Shabab Haider Zaidi, learned counsel on behalf of the respondents is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Syed Shabab Haider Zaidi, learned counsel for the respondents. Present petition has been filed with the following main prayers:- "i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the opposite parties to consider the candidature of the petitioner for the promotion to the post of Mandi Paryavekshak grade 2, being senior to junior candidates who were promoted by the order dated 22.12.2022 annexed as annexure no. 13 to the writ petition within fixed time frame. (ii) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the opposite parties to promote the deponent from the date of promotion of the juniors and fix the pay of the petitioner from the notional date of promotion" Learned counsel for the petitioner, after argument at length, submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court is pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move fresh representation before the respondent no.1 and he may be directed to consider and decide the same, within stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Court. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajiv Srivastava, Avadhesh Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Surendra Kumar Singh, Syed Shabab Haider Zaidi Satyendra Singh .....Petitioner(s) Director Rajya Krishi Uttpadan Mandi Parishad Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Learned counsels for the respondents have no objection to the submission aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the case, the petitioner is given liberty to move fresh representation before the respondent no.1/Director, Rajya Krishi Uttpadan Mandi Parishad within fifteen days and in case such representation is moved, the respondent no.1 is directed to consider and decide the same, in accordance with law, within further period of two months. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. November 21, 2025 Ram Murti WRIA No. 13494 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench