Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 199211 (ALL)

SATYAVEER SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY./PRIN. SECY. GRAMYA VIKAS DEPTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/15047/2025 · 2025-12-19

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15047 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned state counsel for opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed seeking following prayer:- "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding / directing the opposite parties to pay all pending post retiral dues / benefits to the petitioner alongwith admissible interest forthwith." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that aforesaid benefits have not been granted despite the fact that he has superannuated on 30th June, 2022. 4. Since petitioner's grievances would require consideration of factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to make a fresh representation before District Development Officer, District Balrampur. In case such a representation is filed, the same is required to be decided within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority. 5. The petition stands disposed of. December 19, 2025 prabhat Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anurag Tripathi, Pandit Venktesh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Satyaveer Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy./Prin. Secy. Gramya Vikas Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRABHAT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench