Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19920 (KAR)

SRI UMAR FAROOQ @ UMAR UL FAROOQ v. NIA

CRL.A/739/2024 · 2025-06-12

G Basavaraja, Sreenivas Harish Kumar

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20034-DB CRL.A No. 739 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 739 OF 2024 Between: Sri Umar Farooq @ Umar ul Farooq S/o Chekutti Haji Aged about 47 years, Rayan Kandath, Fathima Manzil, Chettipadi, Parappanangadi, Malappuram District Kerala-691445 …Appellant (By Sri Binu M., Advocate) And: NIA Represented by SPP …Respondent (By Sri Vijay Kumar Majage, SPP-II) This Criminal Appeal is filed u/s 21(4) of the NIA Act, 2008 praying to allow this appeal and enlarge the appellant on bail in S.C.No.1478/2010, 1479/2010, 1480/2010, 1481/2010, 1482/2010, 1483/2010, 1484/2010, 1485/2010 and 1486/2010 by the CCB Police, pending on the file of XLIX Digitally signed by VEERENDRA KUMAR K M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20034-DB CRL.A No. 739 of 2024 Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and Special Judge for NIA cases, Bengaluru for the offence p/u/s 120B, 121, 121A r/w 120B, 326 r/w 120B, 324, 326 r/w 120B, 302 r/w 120B, 307 r/w 120B, 435 r/w 120B, 201 r/w 120B, 212 r/w 120B of IPC, secs. 4 and 5 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, secs. 3, 10, 11, 13, 16, 18, 19 and 20 of Unlawful Activities Prevention Act and secs. 3, 4, 5, 6 of Explosive Substances Act. This Criminal Appeal, coming on for orders, this day, orders was made therein as under: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR) Appellant’s counsel files a memo seeking permission to withdraw the appeal. The appellant has sought liberty to file a fresh petition. Placing the memo on record the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. With regard to liberty sought by the appellant, it is to be stated that the appellant has - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20034-DB CRL.A No. 739 of 2024 every right to pursue the remedy in accordance with law. Granting liberty specifically may not arise. Sd/- (SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR) JUDGE Sd/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE SD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1