Om Prakash vs. State of H.P. and another CMP(M) No.735 of 2025 08.01.2026 Present: Mr. Madan Gupal, Advocate, for the applicant. Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General, for respondents/State CMP(M) No.735 of 2025 Heard counsel for the parties. Perused the pleadings. From the averments made in the application filed seeking condonation of delay, there is a sufficient cause which has been shown by the present applicant for not filing the appeal within the period of limitation. Other than the aforesaid, post expiry of limitation, reasonable explanation has been offered in the application for condoning the delay in filing the appeal. In the aforesaid facts and attending circumstances, the delay of 180 days in filing the appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of. RSA No. ______ of 2026 & CMP(M) No. ____ of 2026 Be registered. As prayed, list for admission after ensuing winter vacation alongwith RSA Nos. 227 & 199 of 2025. (Bipin C. Negi) Judge 8th January, 2026 tarun