HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12173 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the accused-applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. Learned counsel for accused-applicant, while pressing the bail application, submits that in the gang chart, three cases have been shown against the applicant. In all the cases, applicant has already been enlarged on bail and specific pleadings have been made in para 4 of the supplementary affidavit. The bail orders have been annexed with the supplementary affidavit. In Case Crime No. 228 of 2024 under Sections 143, 504, 506 IPC applicant is on bail. Apart from the cases mentioned in the gang chart, applicant has criminal history of one more case. In that case also applicant is on bail and pleadings in this regard have been made in para 5 of the supplementary affidavit. Applicant has no other criminal history. It is submitted that co-accused Pankaj Singh and Raghvendra Pratap Singh have already been enlarged on bail. The bail orders are on record as Annexure Nos. 3 and 4 to the supplementary affidavit. Applicant seeks parity with the bail orders of co-accused. It has been further submitted that applicant is in jail since 11.06.2025 and, if facility of bail is granted, there is no apprehension that he will flee from the judicial process and he will abide by the orders passed by the Court below Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ram Sahay Yadav, Rakesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ramsaran .....Applicant(s) State Of Up Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) and will co-operate in speedy trial of the case. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but has not disputed the factual submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-applicant. On due consideration of the facts that the applicant is languishing in jail since 11.06.2025, in the cases mentioned in the gang chart, he is on bail and has explained the criminal history, so also the bail order of the co-accused named above, I find it to be a fit case for enlarging the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed on the ground of parity. Let the applicant- Ramsaran involved in Case Crime/FIR No. 28 of 2025 under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangster Act, 1986, Police Station-Bakshi Ka Talab, District-Lucknow, be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Magistrate/Court concerned, subject to following conditions:- (i) the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; (ii) the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses; (iii) the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. (iv) The applicant shall submit an undertaking on affidavit in terms of Section 19 (4) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 that he will not indulge in any case for or misuse the liberty of bail. Any other condition(s) which the trial court/concerned court may deem fit and proper, in the circumstances of the case, may also be imposed. It is clarified that the observations made in this order are confined to the present bail application and shall have no bearing on the merits of the trial. December 12, 2025 Vinay/- BAIL No. 12173 of 2025 2 (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench