Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 199160 (ALL)

MOINUDDIN AHMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. PRIN. SECY. MINORITY WELFARE DEPTT. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/14957/2025 · 2025-12-19

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14957 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Ashfaq Ahmad Siddiqui, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer: "i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the Opposite Party No. 2, to provide the Promotional Pay Scale of petitioner since 2006 and the Two increments i.e. 2022- 2023. ii) Issue any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case, in favour of the petitioner in the interest of Justice. iii) Allow the writ petition with cost." 3. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the ends of justice would sub-serve if, this Court allows the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the respondent no.2 and he may be directed direct to consider and decide the same, within the time fixed by this Court. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the aforesaid Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Arun Kumar Jaiswal, Pankaj Pandey Moinuddin Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Prin. Secy. Minority Welfare Deptt. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) prayer. 5. Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose off this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation before the respondent no.2- Director, Directorate of Minority Welfare, UP, Lucknow ventilating her grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with her enclosing therewith the copy of her earlier representation, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of 15 days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner, forthwith. December 19, 2025 V. Sinha WRIA No. 14957 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench