ll Il fa-,-I,IE,+I _-+ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH I.: (special orig'lnal JurisdiCt-Ion) ( THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JUI TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY Fl\ PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT P EI±I±Q±!±!QiJ4±£9LgEI292! Between : Bolleddu Kiran Kumar, S/o. Raju, Aged about 33 years, Occ-. Business, R/o.D.No.97-1-16/4, Dariya Nagar, A.C. I College Road, NagaramPalem, Guntur City, Guntur District. ...PETITIONER AND 1. Andhra Evangelical Lutheran Church, Rep by its Controller,(As per orders of wANo.1033/2023) Justice Kurian Joseph, Former Judge, supreme court of India, c/o. AELC Compound, Brodiepet Guntur, Guntur District. 2. Sri Joseph P.S., Sub -Judge, Kerala, Administrator tO Andhra Evangel'lcal Lutheran Church appointed by Justice Kurian Joseph, C/o AELC Compound, Brodiepet Guntur7 Guntur D]]strict. As per Orders Of wANo.1033/2023. 3. Andhra Evangelical Lutheran Church, Rep by 'ltS PresidenVIrustee, Most Rev. Dr. Kollabathula Fredick Paradesi Babu, S/o Late SuryaraO, aged about 61 years. Moderate -Bishop, R/o AELC Compound, Brodiepet Guntur, Guntur District, 4. Andhra Evangelical Lutheran Church, Rep by its Treasurer/Trustee, property officer Kollabathula Moses Arnold, S/a.Suryarao, Aged about 50 years, R/o. D. No, 27-4-59/2, Christian Ashram, Guntur, Guntur District. i=+ i, |' 5.~o Sri Lam Edwin's Memorial Minority Educational Society, Rep by its Secretary and correspondent Mallam Prameela, Edna Sukanya Rani w/o Lam Prakasa Rao, Aged about 45 years, R/o. Sta" GirI's High School CompoundI Guntur, Guntur District. 6. The State ofAndhra Pradesh, Represented by its principal Secretary Home Department At Amaravati. 7. The Superintendent of police, Urban Guntur District 8. The Station House OffI'Cer, Nagarampalem PoII'Ce Station Guntur. .HRESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the HI'gh Court may be pleased to issue writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WR/7- OF MAIVDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents 1 and 2 in without any notice on 18-05-2025, affixed the caution sign board in the petitioner property stating that THIS PROPERTY BELONGS TO AELC ENCROACHERS WILL BE PUNISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW ADMINISTRATOR OF THE AELC as I'Ilegal, arbitrary and capricI-OuS besides violation of Articles 14, 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents 1, 2 and 8 in not to interfere in the PetI'tiOner business activity in leased premI'SeS. ENN_a_: 1 _OF 2q2§ Petition under sectI-On 151 CPC praying that in the c,'rcumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to DIRECT the Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 8 to remove affI|Xed caution sign board in the petitioner property stating that THIS PROPERTY BELONGSTO AELC ENCROACHERS WILL BE PUNISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW ADMINISTRATOR OF THE AELC, and pass such other order or orders as this Honble Court may be pleased to intervene in the I'ntereSt Of J-uStiCe Pending dI'SPOSal of main writ petition Direct the respondent Nos. 7 and 8 to provide police protection to run the petitioner business smoothly. '| EE Counsel for the PetitI|Oner: SRI N.NIRMAL KUIVIAR Counsel for the Respondent Mos.1 1:o 5: ------ Counsel for the Respondent Nos.6 to 8: GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER APHCO10279192025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original JurisdictI-On) [3504] THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE IVIAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM !4£BIT PETITION NO: 14100/2_OL2g Between.- Bolleddu Kiran Kumar, ...PETITIONER AND Andhra Evangelical Lutheran Church and others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the petI-tiOner: 1. N NIRMAL KuMAR Counsel for the Respondent(s).- 1.GP FOR HOME 2. The Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw the present writ petition. PermissI-On iS accorded. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// sd/-M SRINIVAS To, 1. oneccto sri VHG uL tO Sri N.Nl'rma' Kumar, Advocate [opucJ TT:rOeeCCcsDt=oGp=efso.r Home' High1 =`:::-oqf`=::hrr=G:]radesh IO UT] Three cD Copies. rpr' '' L* EEL _ HIGH COURT DATED..05/06/2025 ORDER WP|No|14100 of 2025 +- VACATION COURT DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS