Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 199150 (ALL)

ANJANI AGRAHARI AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO. AND 2 OTHERS

ABAIL/1169/2025 · 2025-10-17

Karunesh Singh Pawar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1169 of 2025 Court No. - 15 HON'BLE KARUNESH SINGH PAWAR, J. 1.Heard learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State. 2.The present application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in case crime No.61 of 2017 under sections 147, 332, 353, 504, 506, 294, 336 I.P.C., P.S. Ahirauli, district Ambedkar Nagar. 3.Learned counsel for applicants, after arguing for some time, submits that he does not want to press the anticipatory bail application; rather he may be granted liberty to file regular bail application and the same may be decided in the light of judgment of Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021. 4.In view of the above, prayer for anticipatory bail is refused and the application is dismissed as not pressed. However, it is provided that in case the applicants file a regular bail application within two weeks from today, the same be decided expeditiously, strictly in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). October 17, 2025 kkb/ Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rahul Srivastava, Subham Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Karunesh Singh Pawar,J.) Anjani Agrahari, Krishna Kumar and Rajendra Kumar alias Raju .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR BARANWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench