- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3897 WP No. 8839 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 8839 OF 2020 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SMT.NOORJAN W/O LATE K.M.IBRAHIM, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, RESIDING AT DOOR NO.3-73, RED BUILDING LANE, KANAKANDY POST, MANGALURU TALUK, D.K.DISTRICT-577 002. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KARUNAKARA.P., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTENT OF REVENUE, VIKASA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MANGALURU, DAKSHINA KANNADA, MANGALURU-575 001. 3. THE TAHASILDAR, MANGALURU TALUK, MANGALURU. 4. THE MANAGER, HDB FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD, NO.1078, 2ND FLOOR, 11TH MAIN, 9TH CROSS, Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3897 WP No. 8839 of 2020 MAHALAKSHMIPURAM MAIN ROAD, MAHALASKHMI LAYOUT, BENGALURU. 5. MR. NASEER AHMED S/O K.M.IBRAHIM, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO.3-73, RED BUILDING LANE, KANKANADY POST, MANGALURU TALUK, D.K.DISTRICT-575 002. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA., AGA FOR R1 TO 3; SRI. MOHITH KUMAR.K., ADVOCATE FOR R5; SRI. V.B.RAVISHANKAR., ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. Sri.Manjunatha Rayappa., AGA for respondents 1 to 3 and Sri.V.B.Ravishankar., counsel for respondent No.4 have appeared in person. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:3897 WP No. 8839 of 2020 As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 27.01.2025, on that day, though matter called twice, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the petitioner, the petition was ordered to be listed on 28.01.2025. The petition is listed today. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 32