Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 199134 (ALL)

PEER MOHAMMAD AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

NA528/2200/2025 · 2025-12-19

Rajeev Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 2200 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Sri Syed Ahmad Jamal, Advocate has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The instant application has been filed with the prayer to quash the criminal case no. 108911 of 2025 (State vs. peer Mohammad and ors) arising out of FIR No.0031 of 2025, under Sections 498-A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Sahadatganj, District lucknow pending on the basis of compromise held between the parties. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that both the parties have amicably compromised their dispute. The compromise which has taken place between the parties is also filed before this Court as Annexure No.4 to the application. 5. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court concerned as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. 6. Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the trial court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Nouphil Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Peer Mohammad And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record. 7. The court concerned in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 8. For a period of one month, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 9. Office is directed to return the original compromise deed, if any, to the learned counsel for the applicants, after taking the photocopy of the same. December 19, 2025 Pks NA528 No. 2200 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- POOJA SETH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench