RAHUL KUMAR VERMA AND 14 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF ENERGY LKO. AND 6 OTHERS
WRIA/10961/2025 · 2025-10-27
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199114 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 199114 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10961 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Piyush Kumar, learned counsel for the State, Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 2 to 6 and perused the record. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following reliefs :- i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding and directing the opposite party No.4 i.e. Chief Engineer, Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited to direct the opposite party No.7 not to remove from their work as Line Maintenance working under M/s Prime One Work Force Private Limited, Bhopal, in the interest justice. ii)Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding and directing opp. party no.4 not to remove from the work as contractual work, in the interest of justice." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioners to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 4/Chief Engineer, Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Ayodhya (Ambedkar Nagar) and the opposite party no. 4 may be directed to consider and decide the same within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court. Learned counsels for the opposite parties have no objection to the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Durga Prasad, Ram Prakash Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Ran Vijay Singh Rahul Kumar Verma And 14 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Energy Lko. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s)
contentions aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case,the petitioners are given liberty to move fresh representation, while raising all their claims and grounds before the opposite party no. 4/ Chief Engineer, Madhyanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Ayodhya (Ambedkar Nagar) within the period of 15 days form today and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the opposite party no. 4 is directed to consider and decide the same within further period of three months, in accordance with law. It is further provided that petitioners shall file their representations individually. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is hereby
disposed of. October 27, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 10961 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench