IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.4727 of 2024 ------ 1. Deepak Kumar aged about 29 years son of Lali Kant Chaudhary, 2. Mithlesh Kumar @ Mithlesh Yadav aged about 36 year. 3. Raza @ Raj Nandan aged about 30 years son of Mohan Lal Sah. All above serial no.1 to 3 are resident of Dundibag, Post & Police Station B.S. City, District Bokaro. .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Manish Yadav, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Kr. Sinha, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No.05 Dated- 27/02/2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest in connection with B.S. City P.S. Case No.93 of 2024 instituted under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 504, 506 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 3/4 of the Witch Craft Act, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to commit murder of informant Arvind Kumar and committed theft of Rs.5,000/-. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is next submitted, drawing attention of this court to Annexure-2, which is copy of the certified copy of the joint compromise petition filed by the parties in the court of Sessions Judge, Bokaro, that therein it has categorically been mentioned that informant does not want to proceed with the case; in view of the compromise between the parties. It is next submitted that because of some misunderstanding, this case has been instituted. It is next submitted that the petitioners have no intention to kill anybody. It is also submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.10,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Bokaro in connection with B.S. City P.S. Case No.93 of 2024 with the condition that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/