Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MMO No.828 of 2024 Date of decision:04.07.2025 Dharam Pal ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. ....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No. For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Mandhotra, Advocate. For the Respondent/State : Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General for the respondent/State. Rakesh Kainthla,Judge (Oral) The answer to the reference has been received from the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court and the Hon’ble Division Bench held that the Court has power to recall any witness or witnesses already examined, even if the evidence on both side is closed. Therefore, the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner that Court was not competent to review its own order does not survive in view of the judgment of Hon’ble Division Bench, hence the present petition stands dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 04th July, 2025 (Ravinder)